When MPs perpetrate a deliberate lie

The Tories claim to want to clean up politicals and the "spin" of new Labour. Indeed, David Cameron has called repeatedly for a new kind of politics.

So perhaps he might want to take action against Nadine Dorries who as has been highlighted HERE is willing to use urban myths that have been refuted by the people she quotes as reasons to support her views.

When you exaggerate or tell lies you've lost the argument

On the topic of abortion rights I am firmly of the opinion that as a man my rights have no real validity as it is a woman's choice whether she does or does not have a termination, so I will not be joining other bloggers in lecturing women on the issue.

However, I take issue with Nadine Dorries, the Tory MP who is proposing that abortions from 20-24 weeks should be stopped. Her key argument, and she raises this over and over again on the radio and in other media, is that more and more premature babies are surviving prior to 24 weeks. This is simply untrue. The current statistics show a small rise in survival rates, but it is considered to be statistically insignificant because of the tiny number of babies born at this point. Using dodgy statistics might be something politicians use in leaflets, but it is not something to use when debating something so serious.

I have a friend who is a nurse in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at the Norfolk and Norwich hospital, which was also the unit my son was in when he was born prematurely. My friend makes clear that the chances of survival before 24 weeks is tiny, but jumps markedly in week 25 and 26. And those that do survive prior to 24 weeks all have health problems that will be with them for the rest of their lives ranging from breathing problems, eyesight and hearing loss and slow development and learning difficulties. Put simply, the rosy picture that Nadine Dorries paints is not a true one.

I've always worked by a general principle that the facts prove themselves and don't need exaggeration in order to prove them. When you start telling lies you've lost the argument.

Another myth exposed - Baby survival rates before 24 weeks

The anti abortion crown have been pushing the argument for some years now that babies born before 24 weeks gestation are surviving in ever greater numbers and this is the main reason for their fight to end abortions at 23 weeks.

The actual figures, revealed today, show that on 27% of babies born at 23 weeks survive, and most of these will have permanent health problems related to under developed lungs and brains.

It appears that the facts don't support the anti abortion groups claims.

I have always been pro choice when it comes to abortion, but I have always felt that terminations beyond 22 weeks are too invasive and even slightly disturbing both in terms of the effect on the foetus, but also the trauma to the woman involved. It is sad therefore that any attempt to amend the abortion act to even bring it down two weeks is undermined by the false arguments of anti choice groups.