A number of armed policemen, all of whom have had a chance to get their story straight and confer with each other, who were involved in shooting Jean Charles de Menezes all claim they shouted a warning before shooting him several times.
Whereas every independent witness, none of whom know each other, who have had no chance to get together and get their stories straight all say they heard no warning.
Who do you believe ?
I'd desperately like to think the police gave Jean Charles a chance, that they didn't gun him down without a chance to prove his innocence. I'd like to think that the police did do their duty, to the letter of the law. It's just the question why would a group of people, completely unrelated to each other, with no history of problems with the police or an axe to grind all say the police were lying ?