3/06/2008

Why Obama won on the 4th March

There is an excellent article in the Telegraph explaining why Obama, not Clinton, was the real winner on 4th March.

Perhaps the clearest reason why it was an Obama victory was that in Texas, he actually won five more delegates than Clinton did, despite it being called a victory for Clinton. That is now two states that Clinton won narrowly on the popular vote (including Nevada), but which Obama actually won if you count the delegates.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

While it may end up that way, so far Obama has won 4 less delegates in Texas, not 5 more.

Nich Starling said...

Actually, if you include the caucases (which Obama won heavily), this is what puts him ahead.

Anonymous said...

Tories have just released the election Manifesto

Diamond White will be 32 p more
White Lighting will be 53p more
Tennets Super will be 33 p more
Tennets Extra will be 45 p more
Leffe Lager will be 47p more
Thunderbird will be £1.26 p more
Caffreys will be 24 p more
VK Ice will be 78 p more
VK Cherry will be 76 p more
Smirnoff Ice will be 89p more

…….Carry on to Ad Nauseaum

Paul Walter said...

But they haven't finished counting the caucuses yet.

Pages