Possibly the most inaccurate load of toss in a newspaper this year. Then again it was written by Rod(erick) Liddle - one of those idiots that repeatedly say the most inane things yet continue to be asked their opinion on shows like the pedants' wankfest that is Question Time.
This, I guess, is because he is taking a national view of the by-election and wants to inflict the maximum possible damage on Gordon Brown and the Labour Party.
If Liddle's leg-up to the Greens pushes Labour into 4th place then he will have succeeded. It should not be interpreted as getting his leg over the Lib Dems.
5 comments:
Rupert Read - self-deprecating?
Possibly the most inaccurate load of toss in a newspaper this year. Then again it was written by Rod(erick) Liddle - one of those idiots that repeatedly say the most inane things yet continue to be asked their opinion on shows like the pedants' wankfest that is Question Time.
Inexplicably wrong-headed.
So Rod is backing a party that avoided by only two vote, backing a conspiracy theory about 9/11.
Rod Liddle is indeed being disingenuous.
This, I guess, is because he is taking a national view of the by-election and wants to inflict the maximum possible damage on Gordon Brown and the Labour Party.
If Liddle's leg-up to the Greens pushes Labour into 4th place then he will have succeeded. It should not be interpreted as getting his leg over the Lib Dems.
Rod Liddle's article in the Specy is attacking people just like Rupert Read.
"Rupert Read. A candidate the main parties would kill for ... a lecturer in philosophy at the University of East Anglia."
Thanks, Rod, for the biggest laugh of the day ...
Post a Comment